‘The List’: 1000 Novels challenge

In early 2009, The Guardian published ‘1000 novels everyone must read: the definitive list’ causing the stir that only labeling something ‘definitive’ can. The Guardian website was flooded with comments demanding to know why their preferred tomes were not included, querying the selection process, and questioning the gender imbalances in terms of author selection, and the ensuing debates, justifications, articles and trivia are well worth your time.

Nonetheless, I was interested to find that as a formerly voracious reader I was not able to cross as many as I would like off the list, and found precious few of my own most enjoyed on there. I did find the dreaded Pamela, which makes me worried about how much I am going to enjoy this challenge… Granted, it is not the list of the most loved novels, but still… Ian Fleming novels? More McEwan than Murakami? Six PG Wodehouses? Only one volume of the Gormenghast trilogy? Worryingly, there were quite a few novels that I can’t believe I haven’t read given my undergraduate. Having begun to read more non-fiction than fiction in the past few years, last summer I decided to use this list as a springboard to return to novels, and to make time for reading in general again. In typical contrary fashion, as soon as I set myself the challenge of reading every novel on this list (albeit before I die, and therefore hopefully with a long time before deadline), I promptly read a slew of novels that are not on the list! As the Guardian have included novels in languages other than English, reading a translation counts as far as I am concerned! My own major bugbear with the selection process is the division into thematic categories. How on earth do these categories make sense? Couldn’t every novel be in the ‘Family and Self’ category? Isn’t every novel, in its own way, a ‘state of the nation’ novel? Yet here the 1000 (or the 998 as it turns out, unless both excel and I have developed a serious counting malfunction) were laid out, clearly demarcated as one of the following
Family and Self,
Science Fiction and Fantasy,
State of the Nation and
War and Travel.

Follow the thematic links above for a progress breakdown – novels already read (either far before this challenge or in the past 6 months) are crossed out, while those already read more than once (or that I want to reread) are in colour. Only repeated readings by choice count (so books I studied, read more than once, and loathed are still in black). Why all 38 (and counting) Discworld novels are included as one entry on the list is anyone’s guess, and I am sure more anomalies will present themselves in the coming months and years, but still…only 618 to go! Anything on the list you think is so brilliant I should get to it asap, or any novel you are appalled is not on the list that you feel I have to read anyway, please let me know, as CS Lewis would say “you can never get a cup of tea large enough or a book long enough to suit me”.

In the meantime – this is not only hilarious, but great advice for anyone who doesn’t want to meet “the nasty me”!


2 thoughts on “‘The List’: 1000 Novels challenge

  1. Well this is a challenge and a half! I like it though, it is mad that all the Discworld books are in one entry but they are good books to break up some of the more epic books. Balance is always good.

  2. Ha ha ha! That video is fab!! Thanks! Also, as for lists of books to read, I currently have 644 in my list and if I go through the one you mention I suspect I’ll likely add a few hundred more…*sigh* so many books, so little time! Love your challenge. Good luck!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s